Tokelau
TKLPolynesia · Oceania
The circle shows each metric's percentile rank (position among countries with data), which is comparable across metrics. Each metric's native score uses its own scale and is not comparable between metrics — see it (and the full formula) in “How is this calculated?”.
3 metrics for this country
Society & culture
100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 49th of 200 · native score 67.99 · reference year 1996
76percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Adult male height
- Scale
- 100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 175.256 cm
- Native score
- 67.99 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 76th percentile — ranks 49th of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (175.26 − 159.79) / (182.54 − 159.79) = 67.99Min and max are this dataset's lowest (159.79) and highest (182.54) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (via Our World in Data) · NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 1996
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Pooled analysis of population-based measured-height studies, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Indexed by year of birth.
Demographics & migration
100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 155th of 237 · native score 27.22 · reference year 2023
35percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Median age
- Scale
- 100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 26.65 years
- Native score
- 27.22 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 35th percentile — ranks 155th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (26.65 − 14.32) / (59.63 − 14.32) = 27.22Min and max are this dataset's lowest (14.32) and highest (59.63) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 46th of 237 · native score 64.1 · reference year 2050
81percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Population change (projection)
- Scale
- 100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 52.1 % change 2024→2050
- Native score
- 64.1 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 81th percentile — ranks 46th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (52.1 − -32.9) / (99.7 − -32.9) = 64.1Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-32.9) and highest (99.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2050
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.