WorldScore
← Map

Wallis and Futuna

WLF

Polynesia · Oceania

The circle shows each metric's percentile rank (position among countries with data), which is comparable across metrics. Each metric's native score uses its own scale and is not comparable between metrics — see it (and the full formula) in “How is this calculated?”.

4 metrics for this country

Environment & infrastructure

  • 100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest

    Ranks 98th of 214 · native score 54.44 · reference year 2024

    54percentile
    How is this calculated?
    Metric
    CO₂ emissions per capita
    Scale
    100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
    Raw value
    2.69911 tonnes CO₂ per capita
    Native score
    54.44 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
    Percentile rank
    54th percentile — ranks 98th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
    Normalization
    Percentile rank across countries
    score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 2.7 among 214 countries ] = 54.44

    The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.

    Source
    Global Carbon Project (via Our World in Data) · Global Carbon Project
    License
    CC BY 4.0
    Reference year
    2024
    Retrieved
    2026-07-12
    Confidence
    Tier A — Official / robust
    Source notes
    Per-capita CO₂ emissions from the Global Carbon Project's Global Carbon Budget, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.

Society & culture

  • 100 = lowest informal employment (best), 0 = highest

    Ranks 50th of 145 · native score 64.17 · reference year 2019

    66percentile
    How is this calculated?
    Metric
    Informal employment
    Scale
    100 = lowest informal employment (best), 0 = highest
    Raw value
    35.992 % of employment
    Native score
    64.17 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
    Percentile rank
    66th percentile — ranks 50th of 145. Comparable across metrics.
    Normalization
    Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
    score = 100 − [ 100 · (35.99 − 1.09) / (98.49 − 1.09) ] = 64.17

    Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.09) and highest (98.49) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.

    Source
    ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
    License
    CC BY 4.0
    Reference year
    2019
    Retrieved
    2026-07-12
    Confidence
    Tier A — Official / robust
    Source notes
    ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.

Demographics & migration

  • Median ageTier ADescriptive

    100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse

    Ranks 83rd of 237 · native score 50.43 · reference year 2023

    65percentile
    How is this calculated?
    Metric
    Median age
    Scale
    100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
    Raw value
    37.166 years
    Native score
    50.43 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
    Percentile rank
    65th percentile — ranks 83rd of 237. Comparable across metrics.
    Normalization
    Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
    score = 100 · (37.17 − 14.32) / (59.63 − 14.32) = 50.43

    Min and max are this dataset's lowest (14.32) and highest (59.63) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.

    Source
    UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
    License
    CC BY 3.0 IGO
    Reference year
    2023
    Retrieved
    2026-07-12
    Confidence
    Tier A — Official / robust
    Source notes
    UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
  • 100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse

    Ranks 195th of 237 · native score 17.27 · reference year 2050

    18percentile
    How is this calculated?
    Metric
    Population change (projection)
    Scale
    100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
    Raw value
    -10 % change 2024→2050
    Native score
    17.27 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
    Percentile rank
    18th percentile — ranks 195th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
    Normalization
    Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
    score = 100 · (-10 − -32.9) / (99.7 − -32.9) = 17.27

    Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-32.9) and highest (99.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.

    Source
    UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
    License
    CC BY 3.0 IGO
    Reference year
    2050
    Retrieved
    2026-07-12
    Confidence
    Tier A — Official / robust
    Source notes
    UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
Wallis and Futuna — country scores · WorldScore