Comoros
COMEastern Africa · Africa · UN member
The circle shows each metric's percentile rank (position among countries with data), which is comparable across metrics. Each metric's native score uses its own scale and is not comparable between metrics — see it (and the full formula) in “How is this calculated?”.
78 metrics for this country
Education
- Adult literacy rateTier A
100 = highest adult literacy in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 117th of 155 · native score 66.68 · reference year 2021
25percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Adult literacy rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest adult literacy in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 75.6202 % of adults
- Native score
- 66.68 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 25th percentile — ranks 117th of 155. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (75.62 − 26.83) / (100 − 26.83) = 66.68Min and max are this dataset's lowest (26.83) and highest (100) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2021
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest education spending (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 172nd of 200 · native score 14.29 · reference year 2023
14percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Government education spending
- Scale
- 100 = highest education spending (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 2.34147 % of GDP
- Native score
- 14.29 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 14th percentile — ranks 172nd of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (2.34 − 0) / (16.39 − 0) = 14.29Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (16.39) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = lowest pupil–teacher ratio (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 148th of 197 · native score 72.38 · reference year 2018
25percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Pupil–teacher ratio (primary)
- Scale
- 100 = lowest pupil–teacher ratio (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 28.0578 pupils per teacher
- Native score
- 72.38 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 25th percentile — ranks 148th of 197. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (28.06 − 6.93) / (83.41 − 6.93) ] = 72.38Min and max are this dataset's lowest (6.93) and highest (83.41) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2018
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest completion in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 168th of 192 · native score 25.33 · reference year 2024
13percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Lower-secondary completion rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest completion in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 44.1416 % of relevant age group
- Native score
- 25.33 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 13th percentile — ranks 168th of 192. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (44.14 − 8.89) / (148.09 − 8.89) = 25.33Min and max are this dataset's lowest (8.89) and highest (148.09) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest tertiary enrollment in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 140th of 195 · native score 10.4 · reference year 2017
28percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Tertiary enrollment ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest tertiary enrollment in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 18.819 % gross enrollment
- Native score
- 10.4 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 28th percentile — ranks 140th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (18.82 − 1.84) / (165.11 − 1.84) = 10.4Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.84) and highest (165.11) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2017
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Society & culture
100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 168th of 200 · native score 28.15 · reference year 1996
16percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Adult male height
- Scale
- 100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 166.194 cm
- Native score
- 28.15 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 16th percentile — ranks 168th of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (166.19 − 159.79) / (182.54 − 159.79) = 28.15Min and max are this dataset's lowest (159.79) and highest (182.54) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (via Our World in Data) · NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 1996
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Pooled analysis of population-based measured-height studies, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Indexed by year of birth.
100 = highest cocoa supply per person in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 109th of 191 · native score 4.12 · reference year 2023
43percentileLow reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
- Metric
- Chocolate supply per person (proxy)
- Scale
- 100 = highest cocoa supply per person in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 0.58 kg cocoa per person / year
- Native score
- 4.12 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 43th percentile — ranks 109th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.58 − 0) / (14.07 − 0) = 4.12Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (14.07) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier C — Survey / proxy
- Source notes
- Cocoa 'food available for consumption' per capita from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. A supply proxy, not measured consumption — Tier C.
100 = highest female participation in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 126th of 186 · native score 54.93 · reference year 2025
33percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Female labour force participation
- Scale
- 100 = highest female participation in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 47.649 % of women 15+
- Native score
- 54.93 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 33th percentile — ranks 126th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (47.65 − 4.66) / (82.91 − 4.66) = 54.93Min and max are this dataset's lowest (4.66) and highest (82.91) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest fish & seafood supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 87th of 191 · native score 19.9 · reference year 2023
55percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fish & seafood supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest fish & seafood supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 16.98 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 19.9 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 55th percentile — ranks 87th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (16.98 − 0.38) / (83.81 − 0.38) = 19.9Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.38) and highest (83.81) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = highest fruit supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 71st of 191 · native score 17.69 · reference year 2023
63percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fruit supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest fruit supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 97.11 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 17.69 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 63th percentile — ranks 71st of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (97.11 − 4.27) / (529.06 − 4.27) = 17.69Min and max are this dataset's lowest (4.27) and highest (529.06) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = most gender-equal (GII 0), 0 = most unequal (GII 1)
Ranks 132nd of 172 · native score 49.9 · reference year 2023
23percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Gender equality (inverted GII)
- Scale
- 100 = most gender-equal (GII 0), 0 = most unequal (GII 1)
- Raw value
- 0.501 index (0–1, lower = more equal)
- Native score
- 49.9 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 23th percentile — ranks 132nd of 172. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (0.5 − 0) / (1 − 0) ] = 49.9The index is kept on its own published scale. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- UNDP Human Development Report (via Our World in Data) · UNDP, Human Development Report Office
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Gender Inequality Index from the UNDP Human Development Report, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
- Informal employmentTier A
100 = lowest informal employment (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 117th of 145 · native score 9.94 · reference year 2021
20percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Informal employment
- Scale
- 100 = lowest informal employment (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 88.809 % of employment
- Native score
- 9.94 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 20th percentile — ranks 117th of 145. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (88.81 − 1.09) / (98.49 − 1.09) ] = 9.94Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.09) and highest (98.49) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2021
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.
100 = highest meat supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 139th of 191 · native score 15.05 · reference year 2023
27percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Meat supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest meat supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 26.59 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 15.05 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 27th percentile — ranks 139th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (26.59 − 3.49) / (156.93 − 3.49) = 15.05Min and max are this dataset's lowest (3.49) and highest (156.93) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = universal social protection coverage, 0 = none
Ranks 209th of 214 · native score 3.1 · reference year 2022
2percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Social protection coverage
- Scale
- 100 = universal social protection coverage, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 3.1 % of population
- Native score
- 3.1 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 2th percentile — ranks 209th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (3.1 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 3.1The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.
100 = most arrivals (2019), 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 165th of 174 · native score 24.74 · reference year 2019
5percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- International tourist arrivals
- Scale
- 100 = most arrivals (2019), 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 45,100 arrivals per year
- Native score
- 24.74 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 5th percentile — ranks 165th of 174. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 45,100 − ln 3,700) / (ln 90,914,000 − ln 3,700) = 24.74Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (3,700) and max (90,914,000) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- UN Tourism (via Our World in Data) · UN Tourism (UNWTO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- International tourist arrivals — overnight visitors — from UN Tourism (UNWTO), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (OWID's processing layer is CC BY; underlying values are UN Tourism).
100 = highest union density in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 81st of 139 · native score 14.42 · reference year 2014
42percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Trade union density
- Scale
- 100 = highest union density in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 13.352 % of employees
- Native score
- 14.42 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 42th percentile — ranks 81st of 139. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (13.35 − 0.2) / (91.42 − 0.2) = 14.42Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.2) and highest (91.42) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2014
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.
100 = highest vegetables supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 150th of 191 · native score 9.63 · reference year 2023
22percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Vegetable supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest vegetables supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 44.56 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 9.63 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 22th percentile — ranks 150th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (44.56 − 5.34) / (412.72 − 5.34) = 9.63Min and max are this dataset's lowest (5.34) and highest (412.72) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
Demographics & migration
100 = highest dependency ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 40th of 215 · native score 60.31 · reference year 2025
82percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Age dependency ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest dependency ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 70.4277 dependents per 100 working-age
- Native score
- 60.31 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 82th percentile — ranks 40th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (70.43 − 20.05) / (103.59 − 20.05) = 60.31Min and max are this dataset's lowest (20.05) and highest (103.59) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest fertility, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 30th of 215 · native score 59.49 · reference year 2024
86percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fertility rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest fertility, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 3.822 births per woman
- Native score
- 59.49 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 86th percentile — ranks 30th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (3.82 − 0.58) / (6.03 − 0.58) = 59.49Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.58) and highest (6.03) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = largest female−male gap, 0 = smallest (or male-favouring) — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 149th of 215 · native score 36.68 · reference year 2024
31percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life expectancy gap (female − male)
- Scale
- 100 = largest female−male gap, 0 = smallest (or male-favouring) — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 4.184 years (female − male)
- Native score
- 36.68 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 31th percentile — ranks 149th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (4.18 − 0.46) / (10.62 − 0.46) = 36.68Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.46) and highest (10.62) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 193rd of 237 · native score 13.27 · reference year 2023
19percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Median age
- Scale
- 100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 20.331 years
- Native score
- 13.27 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 19th percentile — ranks 193rd of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (20.33 − 14.32) / (59.63 − 14.32) = 13.27Min and max are this dataset's lowest (14.32) and highest (59.63) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = highest foreign-born share, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 166th of 214 · native score 1.4 · reference year 2024
23percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Foreign-born population
- Scale
- 100 = highest foreign-born share, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 1.4 % foreign-born
- Native score
- 1.4 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 23th percentile — ranks 166th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (1.4 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 1.4The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest net inflow per capita, 0 = highest net outflow — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 167th of 215 · native score 49.13 · reference year 2025
23percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Net migration rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest net inflow per capita, 0 = highest net outflow — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- -2.409 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 49.13 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 23th percentile — ranks 167th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (-2.41 − -46.91) / (43.67 − -46.91) = 49.13Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-46.91) and highest (43.67) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most populous, 0 = least populous — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 161st of 215 · native score 37.94 · reference year 2025
25percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Total population
- Scale
- 100 = most populous, 0 = least populous — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 882,847 people
- Native score
- 37.94 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 25th percentile — ranks 161st of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 882,847 − ln 9,492) / (ln 1,463,865,525 − ln 9,492) = 37.94Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (9,492) and max (1,463,865,525) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most dense, 0 = least dense — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 25th of 215 · native score 68.03 · reference year 2023
89percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Population density
- Scale
- 100 = most dense, 0 = least dense — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 456.952 people per km²
- Native score
- 68.03 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 89th percentile — ranks 25th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 456.95 − ln 0.14) / (ln 20,569.7 − ln 0.14) = 68.03Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (0.14) and max (20,569.7) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 47th of 237 · native score 63.2 · reference year 2050
80percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Population change (projection)
- Scale
- 100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 50.9 % change 2024→2050
- Native score
- 63.2 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 80th percentile — ranks 47th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (50.9 − -32.9) / (99.7 − -32.9) = 63.2Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-32.9) and highest (99.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2050
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = most refugees produced, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 91st of 211 · native score 57.11 · reference year 2024
57percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Refugees (by origin)
- Scale
- 100 = most refugees produced, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 2,322 refugees
- Native score
- 57.11 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 57th percentile — ranks 91st of 211. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = percentile rank of 2,322 among 211 countries = 57.11The score is the country's position in the distribution.
- Source
- UNHCR (via Our World in Data) · UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Refugee population by country of origin, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = highest remittance inflow (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 13th of 193 · native score 44.19 · reference year 2023
94percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Remittances received
- Scale
- 100 = highest remittance inflow (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 20.8445 % of GDP
- Native score
- 44.19 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 94th percentile — ranks 13th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (20.84 − 0.01) / (47.15 − 0.01) = 44.19Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.01) and highest (47.15) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = fully rural, 0 = fully urban — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 31st of 215 · native score 66.06 · reference year 2025
86percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Rural population share
- Scale
- 100 = fully rural, 0 = fully urban — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 66.0585 % rural
- Native score
- 66.06 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 86th percentile — ranks 31st of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (66.06 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 66.06The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest male-to-female birth ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 185th of 215 · native score 13.82 · reference year 2024
13percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Sex ratio at birth
- Scale
- 100 = highest male-to-female birth ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 1.032 male births per female birth
- Native score
- 13.82 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 13th percentile — ranks 185th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (1.03 − 1.01) / (1.16 − 1.01) = 13.82Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.01) and highest (1.16) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = fully urban, 0 = fully rural — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 185th of 215 · native score 33.94 · reference year 2025
14percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Urbanization
- Scale
- 100 = fully urban, 0 = fully rural — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 33.9415 % urban
- Native score
- 33.94 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 14th percentile — ranks 185th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (33.94 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 33.94The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Economy
- New business densityTier A
100 = highest new-business density in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 136th of 182 · native score 0.37 · reference year 2024
25percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- New business density
- Scale
- 100 = highest new-business density in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 0.764571 new firms per 1,000 aged 15–64
- Native score
- 0.37 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 25th percentile — ranks 136th of 182. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.76 − 0.02) / (201.01 − 0.02) = 0.37Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.02) and highest (201.01) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest employment ratio in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 126th of 186 · native score 49.37 · reference year 2025
33percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Employment-to-population ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest employment ratio in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 53.642 % of population 15+
- Native score
- 49.37 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 33th percentile — ranks 126th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (53.64 − 21.21) / (86.9 − 21.21) = 49.37Min and max are this dataset's lowest (21.21) and highest (86.9) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most export-oriented (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 185th of 192 · native score 4.13 · reference year 2025
4percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Exports of goods & services
- Scale
- 100 = most export-oriented (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 9.2978 % of GDP
- Native score
- 4.13 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 4th percentile — ranks 185th of 192. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (9.3 − 1.1) / (199.76 − 1.1) = 4.13Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.1) and highest (199.76) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = largest net FDI inflow (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 160th of 201 · native score 88.49 · reference year 2024
20percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Foreign direct investment
- Scale
- 100 = largest net FDI inflow (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 0.440971 % of GDP (net inflows)
- Native score
- 88.49 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 20th percentile — ranks 160th of 201. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.44 − -1,303.11) / (170.05 − -1,303.11) = 88.49Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-1,303.11) and highest (170.05) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- GDP growth (projection)Tier B
100 = highest projected growth, 0 = lowest
Ranks 61st of 189 · native score 23.11 · reference year 2031
68percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- GDP growth (projection)
- Scale
- 100 = highest projected growth, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 3.8 % per year (avg 2026–2031)
- Native score
- 23.11 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 68th percentile — ranks 61st of 189. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (3.8 − 0.62) / (14.38 − 0.62) = 23.11Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.62) and highest (14.38) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- IMF (World Economic Outlook) · International Monetary Fund
- License
- IMF terms (reuse with attribution)
- Reference year
- 2031
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- IMF World Economic Outlook via the IMF DataMapper API (imf.org/external/datamapper).
- GDP per capita (PPP)Tier A
100 = highest GDP per capita in the dataset, 0 = lowest (log scale)
Ranks 173rd of 202 · native score 25.11 · reference year 2024
15percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- GDP per capita (PPP)
- Scale
- 100 = highest GDP per capita in the dataset, 0 = lowest (log scale)
- Raw value
- 3,958.53 international $ (PPP, current)
- Native score
- 25.11 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 15th percentile — ranks 173rd of 202. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 3,958.53 − ln 1,154.89) / (ln 155,941.29 − ln 1,154.89) = 25.11Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (1,154.89) and max (155,941.29) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest gross savings (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 151st of 177 · native score 42.24 · reference year 2023
15percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Gross savings
- Scale
- 100 = highest gross savings (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 12.048 % of GDP
- Native score
- 42.24 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 15th percentile — ranks 151st of 177. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (12.05 − -21.13) / (57.42 − -21.13) = 42.24Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-21.13) and highest (57.42) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Income inequality (Gini)Tier A
100 = most equal (lowest Gini in the dataset), 0 = most unequal
Ranks 36th of 167 · native score 81.59 · reference year 2024
78percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Income inequality (Gini)
- Scale
- 100 = most equal (lowest Gini in the dataset), 0 = most unequal
- Raw value
- 30.3 Gini index (0–100)
- Native score
- 81.59 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 78th percentile — ranks 36th of 167. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (30.3 − 23.8) / (59.1 − 23.8) ] = 81.59Min and max are this dataset's lowest (23.8) and highest (59.1) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest inflation in the dataset, 0 = lowest/most negative — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 92nd of 192 · native score 52.34 · reference year 2025
52percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Inflation rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest inflation in the dataset, 0 = lowest/most negative — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 3.24909 % annual change (CPI)
- Native score
- 52.34 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 52th percentile — ranks 92nd of 192. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = percentile rank of 3.25 among 192 countries = 52.34The score is the country's position in the distribution.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Labour productivityTier A
100 = highest output per worker, 0 = lowest
Ranks 152nd of 177 · native score 30.92 · reference year 2024
14percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Labour productivity
- Scale
- 100 = highest output per worker, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 10,396.1 constant PPP$ per worker
- Native score
- 30.92 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 14th percentile — ranks 152nd of 177. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 10,396.07 − ln 2,444.23) / (ln 263,863.91 − ln 2,444.23) = 30.92Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (2,444.23) and max (263,863.91) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest debt (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 159th of 193 · native score 9.56 · reference year 2025
18percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Government debt
- Scale
- 100 = highest debt (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 29.5 % of GDP
- Native score
- 9.56 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 18th percentile — ranks 159th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (29.5 − 0) / (308.7 − 0) = 9.56Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (308.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- IMF (World Economic Outlook) · International Monetary Fund
- License
- IMF terms (reuse with attribution)
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- IMF World Economic Outlook via the IMF DataMapper API (imf.org/external/datamapper).
- Unemployment rateTier A
100 = lowest unemployment in the dataset, 0 = highest
Ranks 66th of 186 · native score 89.17 · reference year 2025
65percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Unemployment rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest unemployment in the dataset, 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 3.819 % of labour force
- Native score
- 89.17 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 65th percentile — ranks 66th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (3.82 − 0.13) / (34.2 − 0.13) ] = 89.17Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.13) and highest (34.2) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Youth unemployment rateTier A
100 = lowest youth unemployment (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 56th of 186 · native score 89.13 · reference year 2025
70percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Youth unemployment rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest youth unemployment (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 8.753 % of labour force 15–24
- Native score
- 89.13 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 70th percentile — ranks 56th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (8.75 − 0.46) / (76.77 − 0.46) ] = 89.13Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.46) and highest (76.77) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Environment & infrastructure
- Climate vulnerabilityTier B
100 = least climate-vulnerable (best), 0 = most vulnerable
Ranks 133rd of 190 · native score 42.13 · reference year 2024
30percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Climate vulnerability
- Scale
- 100 = least climate-vulnerable (best), 0 = most vulnerable
- Raw value
- 0.490113 index (0–1, higher = more vulnerable)
- Native score
- 42.13 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 30th percentile — ranks 133rd of 190. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (0.49 − 0.26) / (0.66 − 0.26) ] = 42.13Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.26) and highest (0.66) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- ND-GAIN Country Index (University of Notre Dame) · University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative
- License
- CC BY 3.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- ND-GAIN vulnerability score. The source ZIP is version-stamped (no stable 'latest' URL), so the snapshot is pinned to a specific release; refreshes are a manual, documented step.
- CO₂ emissions per capitaTier A
100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 45th of 214 · native score 79.21 · reference year 2024
79percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- CO₂ emissions per capita
- Scale
- 100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 0.636545 tonnes CO₂ per capita
- Native score
- 79.21 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 79th percentile — ranks 45th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 0.64 among 214 countries ] = 79.21The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- Global Carbon Project (via Our World in Data) · Global Carbon Project
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita CO₂ emissions from the Global Carbon Project's Global Carbon Budget, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
- Access to electricityTier A
100 = universal electricity access, 0 = none
Ranks 158th of 214 · native score 89.8 · reference year 2023
26percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Access to electricity
- Scale
- 100 = universal electricity access, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 89.8 % of population
- Native score
- 89.8 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 26th percentile — ranks 158th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (89.8 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 89.8The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest energy use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 174th of 177 · native score 25.88 · reference year 2007
2percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Energy use per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest energy use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 66.4584 kg oil-equivalent per capita
- Native score
- 25.88 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 2th percentile — ranks 174th of 177. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 66.46 − ln 9.73) / (ln 16,343.04 − ln 9.73) = 25.88Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (9.73) and max (16,343.04) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2007
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most fixed-broadband subscriptions per capita, 0 = fewest
Ranks 180th of 208 · native score 0.64 · reference year 2023
14percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fixed broadband subscriptions
- Scale
- 100 = most fixed-broadband subscriptions per capita, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 0.387941 per 100 people
- Native score
- 0.64 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 14th percentile — ranks 180th of 208. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.39 − 0) / (60.97 − 0) = 0.64Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (60.97) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most forested, 0 = least — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 138th of 213 · native score 16.98 · reference year 2023
35percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Forest area
- Scale
- 100 = most forested, 0 = least — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 16.9801 % of land area
- Native score
- 16.98 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 35th percentile — ranks 138th of 213. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (16.98 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 16.98The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Internet usersTier A
100 = whole population online, 0 = none
Ranks 180th of 209 · native score 32.52 · reference year 2024
14percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Internet users
- Scale
- 100 = whole population online, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 32.5175 % of population
- Native score
- 32.52 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 14th percentile — ranks 180th of 209. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (32.52 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 32.52The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = best logistics performance (index 5), 0 = worst (1)
Ranks 109th of 169 · native score 39 · reference year 2018
36percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Logistics Performance Index
- Scale
- 100 = best logistics performance (index 5), 0 = worst (1)
- Raw value
- 2.56 index (1–5)
- Native score
- 39 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 36th percentile — ranks 109th of 169. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (2.56 − 1) / (5 − 1) = 39The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2018
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- PM2.5 air pollutionTier A
100 = cleanest air (lowest PM2.5), 0 = most polluted
Ranks 47th of 200 · native score 76.75 · reference year 2023
77percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- PM2.5 air pollution
- Scale
- 100 = cleanest air (lowest PM2.5), 0 = most polluted
- Raw value
- 10.1728 µg/m³
- Native score
- 76.75 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 77th percentile — ranks 47th of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 10.17 among 200 countries ] = 76.75The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Protected land areaTier A
100 = most land protected, 0 = least
Ranks 29th of 212 · native score 33.7 · reference year 2025
87percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Protected land area
- Scale
- 100 = most land protected, 0 = least
- Raw value
- 33.7 % of land area
- Native score
- 33.7 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 87th percentile — ranks 29th of 212. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (33.7 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 33.7The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Renewable energy shareTier A
100 = all energy renewable, 0 = none
Ranks 62nd of 212 · native score 39.3 · reference year 2022
71percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Renewable energy share
- Scale
- 100 = all energy renewable, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 39.3 % of final energy
- Native score
- 39.3 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 71th percentile — ranks 62nd of 212. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (39.3 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 39.3The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Safety & crime
100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
Ranks 1st of 197 · native score 63.71 · reference year 2025
64percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Deaths in armed conflicts
- Scale
- 100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
- Raw value
- 0 deaths per year
- Native score
- 63.71 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 64th percentile — ranks 1st of 197. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 0 among 197 countries ] = 63.71The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program (via Our World in Data) · Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Deaths in armed conflicts, best estimate, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = fewest internally displaced (most stable), 0 = most
Ranks 1st of 82 · native score 98.78 · reference year 2024
99percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Internally displaced persons
- Scale
- 100 = fewest internally displaced (most stable), 0 = most
- Raw value
- 11 people
- Native score
- 98.78 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 99th percentile — ranks 1st of 82. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 11 among 82 countries ] = 98.78The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Road-traffic deathsTier B
100 = lowest road-death rate (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 148th of 190 · native score 58.82 · reference year 2019
22percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Road-traffic deaths
- Scale
- 100 = lowest road-death rate (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 26.6 deaths per 100,000
- Native score
- 58.82 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 22th percentile — ranks 148th of 190. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (26.6 − 0) / (64.6 − 0) ] = 58.82Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (64.6) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Governance & institutions
100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
Ranks 158th of 180 · native score 21 · reference year 2024
11percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Corruption Perceptions Index
- Scale
- 100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
- Raw value
- 21 CPI score (0–100)
- Native score
- 21 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 11th percentile — ranks 158th of 180. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (21 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 21The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- Transparency International · Transparency International
- License
- CC BY-ND 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- CPI retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (ourworldindata.org/grapher/ti-corruption-perception-index), which republishes the official TI CPI series verbatim. Snapshot verified against Transparency International's official CPI 2024 figures and matches exactly (spot-checked: DNK 90, FIN 88, SGP 84, DEU 75, USA 65, ESP 56, SSD 8). We were unable to fetch TI's primary file directly (their CDN returns an access-denied stub for the CPI xlsx and no clean CSV is offered), so the OWID mirror is the machine-readable source; primary source and methodology owner is Transparency International.
100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
Ranks 118th of 175 · native score 29.3 · reference year 2025
32percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Electoral democracy index
- Scale
- 100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
- Raw value
- 0.293 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 29.3 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 32th percentile — ranks 118th of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.29 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 29.3The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
Ranks 123rd of 175 · native score 49.8 · reference year 2025
30percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Freedom of expression index
- Scale
- 100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
- Raw value
- 0.498 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 49.8 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 30th percentile — ranks 123rd of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.5 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 49.8The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
- Government effectivenessTier A
100 = strongest government effectiveness (index +2.5), 0 = weakest (−2.5)
Ranks 187th of 204 · native score 25.83 · reference year 2024
9percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Government effectiveness
- Scale
- 100 = strongest government effectiveness (index +2.5), 0 = weakest (−2.5)
- Raw value
- -1.2086 index (−2.5 to +2.5)
- Native score
- 25.83 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 9th percentile — ranks 187th of 204. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (-1.21 − -2.5) / (2.5 − -2.5) = 25.83The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Rule of law indexTier A
100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
Ranks 143rd of 175 · native score 17.5 · reference year 2025
19percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Rule of law index
- Scale
- 100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
- Raw value
- 0.175 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 17.5 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 19th percentile — ranks 143rd of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.18 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 17.5The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
- Women in parliamentTier A
100 = all seats held by women, 0 = none (≈50 = parity)
Ranks 137th of 193 · native score 18.18 · reference year 2025
29percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Women in parliament
- Scale
- 100 = all seats held by women, 0 = none (≈50 = parity)
- Raw value
- 18.1818 % of seats
- Native score
- 18.18 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 29th percentile — ranks 137th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (18.18 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 18.18The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Health
- Diabetes prevalenceTier A
100 = lowest diabetes prevalence (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 141st of 208 · native score 68.9 · reference year 2024
32percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Diabetes prevalence
- Scale
- 100 = lowest diabetes prevalence (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 10.8 % of adults 20–79
- Native score
- 68.9 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 32th percentile — ranks 141st of 208. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (10.8 − 1.5) / (31.4 − 1.5) ] = 68.9Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.5) and highest (31.4) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest health spending per capita, 0 = lowest
Ranks 144th of 193 · native score 26.59 · reference year 2023
26percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Health expenditure per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest health spending per capita, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 102.231 current US$ per capita
- Native score
- 26.59 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 26th percentile — ranks 144th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 102.23 − ln 17.44) / (ln 13,473.19 − ln 17.44) = 26.59Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (17.44) and max (13,473.19) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Hospital beds per 1,000Tier A
100 = most hospital beds per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
Ranks 100th of 191 · native score 9.2 · reference year 2010
48percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Hospital beds per 1,000
- Scale
- 100 = most hospital beds per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 2.16 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 9.2 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 48th percentile — ranks 100th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (2.16 − 0.15) / (21.99 − 0.15) = 9.2Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.15) and highest (21.99) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2010
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = full DTP3 coverage, 0 = none
Ranks 157th of 193 · native score 75 · reference year 2024
18percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Immunization coverage (DTP3)
- Scale
- 100 = full DTP3 coverage, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 75 % of children aged 12–23 months
- Native score
- 75 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 18th percentile — ranks 157th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (75 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 75The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Infant mortality rateTier A
100 = lowest infant mortality in the dataset, 0 = highest
Ranks 164th of 195 · native score 52.19 · reference year 2024
16percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Infant mortality rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest infant mortality in the dataset, 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 35 per 1,000 live births
- Native score
- 52.19 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 16th percentile — ranks 164th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (35 − 1.2) / (71.9 − 1.2) ] = 52.19Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.2) and highest (71.9) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Life expectancy at birthTier A
100 = longest life expectancy in the dataset, 0 = shortest
Ranks 177th of 215 · native score 38.88 · reference year 2024
18percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life expectancy at birth
- Scale
- 100 = longest life expectancy in the dataset, 0 = shortest
- Raw value
- 67.023 years
- Native score
- 38.88 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 18th percentile — ranks 177th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (67.02 − 54.64) / (86.5 − 54.64) = 38.88Min and max are this dataset's lowest (54.64) and highest (86.5) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Maternal mortality ratioTier A
100 = lowest maternal mortality (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 153rd of 194 · native score 21.39 · reference year 2023
21percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Maternal mortality ratio
- Scale
- 100 = lowest maternal mortality (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 179 deaths per 100,000 live births
- Native score
- 21.39 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 21th percentile — ranks 153rd of 194. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 179 among 194 countries ] = 21.39The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Physicians per 1,000Tier A
100 = most physicians per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
Ranks 146th of 195 · native score 4.06 · reference year 2022
25percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Physicians per 1,000
- Scale
- 100 = most physicians per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 0.424 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 4.06 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 25th percentile — ranks 146th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.42 − 0.04) / (9.54 − 0.04) = 4.06Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.04) and highest (9.54) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Safe sanitationTier A
100 = universal safe sanitation, 0 = none
Ranks 86th of 145 · native score 49.36 · reference year 2024
41percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Safe sanitation
- Scale
- 100 = universal safe sanitation, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 49.3555 % of population
- Native score
- 49.36 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 41th percentile — ranks 86th of 145. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (49.36 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 49.36The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Tobacco useTier A
100 = lowest tobacco use (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 26th of 166 · native score 87.31 · reference year 2024
84percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Tobacco use
- Scale
- 100 = lowest tobacco use (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 8.9 % of adults
- Native score
- 87.31 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 84th percentile — ranks 26th of 166. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (8.9 − 3.1) / (48.8 − 3.1) ] = 87.31Min and max are this dataset's lowest (3.1) and highest (48.8) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Under-5 mortality rateTier A
100 = lowest under-5 mortality (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 154th of 195 · native score 21.03 · reference year 2024
21percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Under-5 mortality rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest under-5 mortality (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 39 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Native score
- 21.03 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 21th percentile — ranks 154th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 39 among 195 countries ] = 21.03The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- UndernourishmentTier A
100 = lowest undernourishment (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 132nd of 169 · native score 75.05 · reference year 2023
22percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Undernourishment
- Scale
- 100 = lowest undernourishment (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 15.4 % of population
- Native score
- 75.05 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 22th percentile — ranks 132nd of 169. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (15.4 − 2.5) / (54.2 − 2.5) ] = 75.05Min and max are this dataset's lowest (2.5) and highest (54.2) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Quality of life & wellbeing
- Human Development IndexTier A
100 = highest human development (HDI 1.0), 0 = lowest (HDI 0)
Ranks 152nd of 193 · native score 60.3 · reference year 2023
22percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Human Development Index
- Scale
- 100 = highest human development (HDI 1.0), 0 = lowest (HDI 0)
- Raw value
- 0.603 HDI (0–1)
- Native score
- 60.3 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 22th percentile — ranks 152nd of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.6 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 60.3The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- UNDP — Human Development Report · United Nations Development Programme
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Human Development Index, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-development-index), which republishes the UNDP HDR series. Primary source and methodology owner is UNDP.
100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
Ranks 147th of 165 · native score 39.25 · reference year 2025
11percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life satisfaction (happiness)
- Scale
- 100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
- Raw value
- 3.925 Cantril ladder (0–10)
- Native score
- 39.25 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 11th percentile — ranks 147th of 165. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (3.93 − 0) / (10 − 0) = 39.25The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Happiness Report (via Our World in Data) · World Happiness Report / Gallup
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- Self-reported life evaluation (Cantril ladder, 0–10) from the Gallup World Poll, published in the World Happiness Report, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Survey-based (Tier B).