Cuba
CUBCaribbean · Americas · UN member
The circle shows each metric's percentile rank (position among countries with data), which is comparable across metrics. Each metric's native score uses its own scale and is not comparable between metrics — see it (and the full formula) in “How is this calculated?”.
71 metrics for this country
Education
- Adult literacy rateTier A
100 = highest adult literacy in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 45th of 155 · native score 96.79 · reference year 2019
71percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Adult literacy rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest adult literacy in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 97.65 % of adults
- Native score
- 96.79 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 71th percentile — ranks 45th of 155. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (97.65 − 26.83) / (100 − 26.83) = 96.79Min and max are this dataset's lowest (26.83) and highest (100) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest education spending (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 7th of 200 · native score 51.5 · reference year 2022
97percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Government education spending
- Scale
- 100 = highest education spending (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 8.44086 % of GDP
- Native score
- 51.5 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 97th percentile — ranks 7th of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (8.44 − 0) / (16.39 − 0) = 51.5Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (16.39) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Mean years of schoolingTier A
100 = most years of schooling in the dataset, 0 = fewest
Ranks 35th of 146 · native score 80.09 · reference year 2020
76percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Mean years of schooling
- Scale
- 100 = most years of schooling in the dataset, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 11.61 years
- Native score
- 80.09 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 76th percentile — ranks 35th of 146. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (11.61 − 3.04) / (13.74 − 3.04) = 80.09Min and max are this dataset's lowest (3.04) and highest (13.74) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- Our World in Data · Our World in Data
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2020
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Mean years of schooling series compiled by Our World in Data from UNDP Human Development Report and UNESCO education statistics.
100 = lowest pupil–teacher ratio (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 7th of 197 · native score 97.08 · reference year 2018
97percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Pupil–teacher ratio (primary)
- Scale
- 100 = lowest pupil–teacher ratio (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 9.16029 pupils per teacher
- Native score
- 97.08 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 97th percentile — ranks 7th of 197. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (9.16 − 6.93) / (83.41 − 6.93) ] = 97.08Min and max are this dataset's lowest (6.93) and highest (83.41) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2018
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Researchers in R&DTier A
100 = most researchers per capita, 0 = fewest
Ranks 45th of 144 · native score 77.51 · reference year 2024
69percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Researchers in R&D
- Scale
- 100 = most researchers per capita, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 2,171.26 per million people
- Native score
- 77.51 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 69th percentile — ranks 45th of 144. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 2,171.26 − ln 1.45) / (ln 18,129.75 − ln 1.45) = 77.51Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (1.45) and max (18,129.75) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest completion in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 94th of 192 · native score 57.71 · reference year 2024
51percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Lower-secondary completion rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest completion in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 89.227 % of relevant age group
- Native score
- 57.71 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 51th percentile — ranks 94th of 192. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (89.23 − 8.89) / (148.09 − 8.89) = 57.71Min and max are this dataset's lowest (8.89) and highest (148.09) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest tertiary enrollment in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 96th of 195 · native score 25.27 · reference year 2024
51percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Tertiary enrollment ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest tertiary enrollment in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 43.1041 % gross enrollment
- Native score
- 25.27 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 51th percentile — ranks 96th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (43.1 − 1.84) / (165.11 − 1.84) = 25.27Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.84) and highest (165.11) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Society & culture
100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 89th of 200 · native score 53.66 · reference year 1996
56percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Adult male height
- Scale
- 100 = tallest mean male height, 0 = shortest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 171.996 cm
- Native score
- 53.66 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 56th percentile — ranks 89th of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (172 − 159.79) / (182.54 − 159.79) = 53.66Min and max are this dataset's lowest (159.79) and highest (182.54) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (via Our World in Data) · NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 1996
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Pooled analysis of population-based measured-height studies, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Indexed by year of birth.
100 = highest cocoa supply per person in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 118th of 191 · native score 3.41 · reference year 2019
38percentileLow reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
- Metric
- Chocolate supply per person (proxy)
- Scale
- 100 = highest cocoa supply per person in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 0.48 kg cocoa per person / year
- Native score
- 3.41 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 38th percentile — ranks 118th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (0.48 − 0) / (14.07 − 0) = 3.41Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (14.07) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier C — Survey / proxy
- Source notes
- Cocoa 'food available for consumption' per capita from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. A supply proxy, not measured consumption — Tier C.
100 = highest female participation in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 150th of 186 · native score 45.13 · reference year 2025
20percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Female labour force participation
- Scale
- 100 = highest female participation in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 39.974 % of women 15+
- Native score
- 45.13 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 20th percentile — ranks 150th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (39.97 − 4.66) / (82.91 − 4.66) = 45.13Min and max are this dataset's lowest (4.66) and highest (82.91) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest fish & seafood supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 148th of 191 · native score 6.86 · reference year 2019
23percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fish & seafood supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest fish & seafood supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 6.1 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 6.86 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 23th percentile — ranks 148th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (6.1 − 0.38) / (83.81 − 0.38) = 6.86Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.38) and highest (83.81) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = highest fruit supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 19th of 191 · native score 29.66 · reference year 2019
90percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fruit supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest fruit supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 159.9 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 29.66 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 90th percentile — ranks 19th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (159.9 − 4.27) / (529.06 − 4.27) = 29.66Min and max are this dataset's lowest (4.27) and highest (529.06) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = most gender-equal (GII 0), 0 = most unequal (GII 1)
Ranks 75th of 172 · native score 70.4 · reference year 2023
57percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Gender equality (inverted GII)
- Scale
- 100 = most gender-equal (GII 0), 0 = most unequal (GII 1)
- Raw value
- 0.296 index (0–1, lower = more equal)
- Native score
- 70.4 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 57th percentile — ranks 75th of 172. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (0.3 − 0) / (1 − 0) ] = 70.4The index is kept on its own published scale. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- UNDP Human Development Report (via Our World in Data) · UNDP, Human Development Report Office
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Gender Inequality Index from the UNDP Human Development Report, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = highest meat supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 75th of 191 · native score 40.56 · reference year 2019
61percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Meat supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest meat supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 65.72 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 40.56 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 61th percentile — ranks 75th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (65.72 − 3.49) / (156.93 − 3.49) = 40.56Min and max are this dataset's lowest (3.49) and highest (156.93) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
100 = universal social protection coverage, 0 = none
Ranks 90th of 214 · native score 63.9 · reference year 2022
58percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Social protection coverage
- Scale
- 100 = universal social protection coverage, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 63.9 % of population
- Native score
- 63.9 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 58th percentile — ranks 90th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (63.9 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 63.9The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.
100 = most arrivals (2019), 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 54th of 174 · native score 69.73 · reference year 2019
69percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- International tourist arrivals
- Scale
- 100 = most arrivals (2019), 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 4,263,000 arrivals per year
- Native score
- 69.73 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 69th percentile — ranks 54th of 174. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 4,263,000 − ln 3,700) / (ln 90,914,000 − ln 3,700) = 69.73Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (3,700) and max (90,914,000) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- UN Tourism (via Our World in Data) · UN Tourism (UNWTO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- International tourist arrivals — overnight visitors — from UN Tourism (UNWTO), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (OWID's processing layer is CC BY; underlying values are UN Tourism).
100 = highest union density in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 2nd of 139 · native score 89.03 · reference year 2008
99percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Trade union density
- Scale
- 100 = highest union density in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 81.412 % of employees
- Native score
- 89.03 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 99th percentile — ranks 2nd of 139. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (81.41 − 0.2) / (91.42 − 0.2) = 89.03Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.2) and highest (91.42) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- ILOSTAT (International Labour Organization) · International Labour Organization
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2008
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- ILOSTAT via the ILO rplumber API (rplumber.ilo.org). CC BY 4.0 for databases published since 3 May 2023.
100 = highest vegetables supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 34th of 191 · native score 40.86 · reference year 2019
82percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Vegetable supply per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest vegetables supply per person, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 171.79 kg per person per year
- Native score
- 40.86 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 82th percentile — ranks 34th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (171.79 − 5.34) / (412.72 − 5.34) = 40.86Min and max are this dataset's lowest (5.34) and highest (412.72) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- FAO Food Balance Sheets (via Our World in Data) · Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita food available for consumption from the FAO Food Balance Sheets, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. This is national food SUPPLY per person, not measured intake.
Demographics & migration
100 = highest dependency ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 165th of 215 · native score 32.48 · reference year 2025
23percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Age dependency ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest dependency ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 47.186 dependents per 100 working-age
- Native score
- 32.48 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 23th percentile — ranks 165th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (47.19 − 20.05) / (103.59 − 20.05) = 32.48Min and max are this dataset's lowest (20.05) and highest (103.59) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest fertility, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 164th of 215 · native score 15.85 · reference year 2024
24percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fertility rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest fertility, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 1.445 births per woman
- Native score
- 15.85 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 24th percentile — ranks 164th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (1.45 − 0.58) / (6.03 − 0.58) = 15.85Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.58) and highest (6.03) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = largest female−male gap, 0 = smallest (or male-favouring) — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 115th of 215 · native score 42.92 · reference year 2024
47percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life expectancy gap (female − male)
- Scale
- 100 = largest female−male gap, 0 = smallest (or male-favouring) — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 4.818 years (female − male)
- Native score
- 42.92 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 47th percentile — ranks 115th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (4.82 − 0.46) / (10.62 − 0.46) = 42.92Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.46) and highest (10.62) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 41st of 237 · native score 60.45 · reference year 2023
83percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Median age
- Scale
- 100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 41.709 years
- Native score
- 60.45 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 83th percentile — ranks 41st of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (41.71 − 14.32) / (59.63 − 14.32) = 60.45Min and max are this dataset's lowest (14.32) and highest (59.63) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = highest foreign-born share, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 210th of 214 · native score 0.1 · reference year 2010
1percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Foreign-born population
- Scale
- 100 = highest foreign-born share, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 0.1 % foreign-born
- Native score
- 0.1 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 1th percentile — ranks 210th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.1 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 0.1The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2010
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest net inflow per capita, 0 = highest net outflow — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 160th of 215 · native score 49.54 · reference year 2025
26percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Net migration rate
- Scale
- 100 = highest net inflow per capita, 0 = highest net outflow — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- -2.034 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 49.54 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 26th percentile — ranks 160th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (-2.03 − -46.91) / (43.67 − -46.91) = 49.54Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-46.91) and highest (43.67) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most populous, 0 = least populous — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 87th of 215 · native score 59.01 · reference year 2025
60percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Total population
- Scale
- 100 = most populous, 0 = least populous — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 10,937,203 people
- Native score
- 59.01 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 60th percentile — ranks 87th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 10,937,203 − ln 9,492) / (ln 1,463,865,525 − ln 9,492) = 59.01Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (9,492) and max (1,463,865,525) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most dense, 0 = least dense — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 98th of 215 · native score 55.77 · reference year 2023
55percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Population density
- Scale
- 100 = most dense, 0 = least dense — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 106.165 people per km²
- Native score
- 55.77 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 55th percentile — ranks 98th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 106.17 − ln 0.14) / (ln 20,569.7 − ln 0.14) = 55.77Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (0.14) and max (20,569.7) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 209th of 237 · native score 13.8 · reference year 2050
12percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Population change (projection)
- Scale
- 100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- -14.6 % change 2024→2050
- Native score
- 13.8 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 12th percentile — ranks 209th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (-14.6 − -32.9) / (99.7 − -32.9) = 13.8Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-32.9) and highest (99.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2050
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = most refugees produced, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 44th of 211 · native score 79.38 · reference year 2024
79percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Refugees (by origin)
- Scale
- 100 = most refugees produced, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 23,865 refugees
- Native score
- 79.38 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 79th percentile — ranks 44th of 211. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = percentile rank of 23,865 among 211 countries = 79.38The score is the country's position in the distribution.
- Source
- UNHCR (via Our World in Data) · UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Refugee population by country of origin, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
100 = fully rural, 0 = fully urban — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 146th of 215 · native score 22.77 · reference year 2025
32percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Rural population share
- Scale
- 100 = fully rural, 0 = fully urban — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 22.7729 % rural
- Native score
- 22.77 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 32th percentile — ranks 146th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (22.77 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 22.77The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest male-to-female birth ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 22nd of 215 · native score 38.82 · reference year 2024
89percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Sex ratio at birth
- Scale
- 100 = highest male-to-female birth ratio, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 1.07 male births per female birth
- Native score
- 38.82 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 89th percentile — ranks 22nd of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (1.07 − 1.01) / (1.16 − 1.01) = 38.82Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.01) and highest (1.16) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = fully urban, 0 = fully rural — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 70th of 215 · native score 77.23 · reference year 2025
68percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Urbanization
- Scale
- 100 = fully urban, 0 = fully rural — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 77.2271 % urban
- Native score
- 77.23 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 68th percentile — ranks 70th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (77.23 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 77.23The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Environment & infrastructure
100 = most air passengers, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 140th of 177 · native score 21.19 · reference year 2023
21percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Air transport passengers
- Scale
- 100 = most air passengers, 0 = fewest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 136,998 passengers per year
- Native score
- 21.19 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 21th percentile — ranks 140th of 177. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = percentile rank of 136,998 among 177 countries = 21.19The score is the country's position in the distribution.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Climate vulnerabilityTier B
100 = least climate-vulnerable (best), 0 = most vulnerable
Ranks 108th of 190 · native score 50.57 · reference year 2024
43percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Climate vulnerability
- Scale
- 100 = least climate-vulnerable (best), 0 = most vulnerable
- Raw value
- 0.457076 index (0–1, higher = more vulnerable)
- Native score
- 50.57 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 43th percentile — ranks 108th of 190. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (0.46 − 0.26) / (0.66 − 0.26) ] = 50.57Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.26) and highest (0.66) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- ND-GAIN Country Index (University of Notre Dame) · University of Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative
- License
- CC BY 3.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- ND-GAIN vulnerability score. The source ZIP is version-stamped (no stable 'latest' URL), so the snapshot is pinned to a specific release; refreshes are a manual, documented step.
- CO₂ emissions per capitaTier A
100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 87th of 214 · native score 59.58 · reference year 2024
60percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- CO₂ emissions per capita
- Scale
- 100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 2.22593 tonnes CO₂ per capita
- Native score
- 59.58 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 60th percentile — ranks 87th of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 2.23 among 214 countries ] = 59.58The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- Global Carbon Project (via Our World in Data) · Global Carbon Project
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Per-capita CO₂ emissions from the Global Carbon Project's Global Carbon Budget, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
- Access to electricityTier A
100 = universal electricity access, 0 = none
Ranks 1st of 214 · native score 100 · reference year 2023
70percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Access to electricity
- Scale
- 100 = universal electricity access, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 100 % of population
- Native score
- 100 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 70th percentile — ranks 1st of 214. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (100 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 100The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest electricity use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 98th of 149 · native score 57.07 · reference year 2023
35percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Electricity use per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest electricity use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 1,461.72 kWh per capita
- Native score
- 57.07 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 35th percentile — ranks 98th of 149. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 1,461.72 − ln 13.72) / (ln 48,997.95 − ln 13.72) = 57.07Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (13.72) and max (48,997.95) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest energy use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 112th of 177 · native score 58.96 · reference year 2023
37percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Energy use per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest energy use per capita, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 775.831 kg oil-equivalent per capita
- Native score
- 58.96 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 37th percentile — ranks 112th of 177. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 775.83 − ln 9.73) / (ln 16,343.04 − ln 9.73) = 58.96Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (9.73) and max (16,343.04) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most fixed-broadband subscriptions per capita, 0 = fewest
Ranks 148th of 208 · native score 5.06 · reference year 2024
29percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Fixed broadband subscriptions
- Scale
- 100 = most fixed-broadband subscriptions per capita, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 3.08298 per 100 people
- Native score
- 5.06 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 29th percentile — ranks 148th of 208. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (3.08 − 0) / (60.97 − 0) = 5.06Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (60.97) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most forested, 0 = least — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 106th of 213 · native score 31.23 · reference year 2023
50percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Forest area
- Scale
- 100 = most forested, 0 = least — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 31.2331 % of land area
- Native score
- 31.23 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 50th percentile — ranks 106th of 213. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (31.23 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 31.23The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Internet usersTier A
100 = whole population online, 0 = none
Ranks 130th of 209 · native score 70.48 · reference year 2024
38percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Internet users
- Scale
- 100 = whole population online, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 70.477 % of population
- Native score
- 70.48 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 38th percentile — ranks 130th of 209. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (70.48 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 70.48The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = best logistics performance (index 5), 0 = worst (1)
Ranks 157th of 169 · native score 30 · reference year 2022
7percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Logistics Performance Index
- Scale
- 100 = best logistics performance (index 5), 0 = worst (1)
- Raw value
- 2.2 index (1–5)
- Native score
- 30 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 7th percentile — ranks 157th of 169. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (2.2 − 1) / (5 − 1) = 30The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2022
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- PM2.5 air pollutionTier A
100 = cleanest air (lowest PM2.5), 0 = most polluted
Ranks 42nd of 200 · native score 79.25 · reference year 2023
79percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- PM2.5 air pollution
- Scale
- 100 = cleanest air (lowest PM2.5), 0 = most polluted
- Raw value
- 9.44802 µg/m³
- Native score
- 79.25 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 79th percentile — ranks 42nd of 200. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 9.45 among 200 countries ] = 79.25The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Protected land areaTier A
100 = most land protected, 0 = least
Ranks 120th of 212 · native score 15.6 · reference year 2025
43percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Protected land area
- Scale
- 100 = most land protected, 0 = least
- Raw value
- 15.6 % of land area
- Native score
- 15.6 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 43th percentile — ranks 120th of 212. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (15.6 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 15.6The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Renewable energy shareTier A
100 = all energy renewable, 0 = none
Ranks 103rd of 212 · native score 20.9 · reference year 2021
52percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Renewable energy share
- Scale
- 100 = all energy renewable, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 20.9 % of final energy
- Native score
- 20.9 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 52th percentile — ranks 103rd of 212. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (20.9 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 20.9The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2021
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Safety & crime
100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
Ranks 1st of 197 · native score 63.71 · reference year 2025
64percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Deaths in armed conflicts
- Scale
- 100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
- Raw value
- 0 deaths per year
- Native score
- 63.71 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 64th percentile — ranks 1st of 197. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 0 among 197 countries ] = 63.71The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- Uppsala Conflict Data Program (via Our World in Data) · Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP)
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Deaths in armed conflicts, best estimate, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
- Homicide rateTier A
100 = safest (fewest homicides), 0 = most homicides
Ranks 121st of 193 · native score 37.56 · reference year 2019
38percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Homicide rate
- Scale
- 100 = safest (fewest homicides), 0 = most homicides
- Raw value
- 4.46315 per 100,000 population
- Native score
- 37.56 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 38th percentile — ranks 121st of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 4.46 among 193 countries ] = 37.56The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- UNODC (via World Bank) · UN Office on Drugs and Crime / World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Intentional homicide victims per 100,000, indicator VC.IHR.PSRC.P5, retrieved via the World Bank API. Primary source is UNODC; the World Bank redistributes the series under CC BY 4.0.
- Road-traffic deathsTier B
100 = lowest road-death rate (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 59th of 190 · native score 86.22 · reference year 2019
69percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Road-traffic deaths
- Scale
- 100 = lowest road-death rate (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 8.9 deaths per 100,000
- Native score
- 86.22 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 69th percentile — ranks 59th of 190. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (8.9 − 0) / (64.6 − 0) ] = 86.22Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (64.6) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2019
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Governance & institutions
100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
Ranks 82nd of 180 · native score 41 · reference year 2024
53percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Corruption Perceptions Index
- Scale
- 100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
- Raw value
- 41 CPI score (0–100)
- Native score
- 41 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 53th percentile — ranks 82nd of 180. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (41 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 41The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- Transparency International · Transparency International
- License
- CC BY-ND 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- CPI retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (ourworldindata.org/grapher/ti-corruption-perception-index), which republishes the official TI CPI series verbatim. Snapshot verified against Transparency International's official CPI 2024 figures and matches exactly (spot-checked: DNK 90, FIN 88, SGP 84, DEU 75, USA 65, ESP 56, SSD 8). We were unable to fetch TI's primary file directly (their CDN returns an access-denied stub for the CPI xlsx and no clean CSV is offered), so the OWID mirror is the machine-readable source; primary source and methodology owner is Transparency International.
100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
Ranks 145th of 175 · native score 17.6 · reference year 2025
17percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Electoral democracy index
- Scale
- 100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
- Raw value
- 0.176 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 17.6 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 17th percentile — ranks 145th of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.18 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 17.6The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
Ranks 163rd of 175 · native score 7.4 · reference year 2025
7percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Freedom of expression index
- Scale
- 100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
- Raw value
- 0.074 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 7.4 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 7th percentile — ranks 163rd of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.07 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 7.4The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
- Government effectivenessTier A
100 = strongest government effectiveness (index +2.5), 0 = weakest (−2.5)
Ranks 125th of 204 · native score 44.61 · reference year 2024
39percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Government effectiveness
- Scale
- 100 = strongest government effectiveness (index +2.5), 0 = weakest (−2.5)
- Raw value
- -0.269518 index (−2.5 to +2.5)
- Native score
- 44.61 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 39th percentile — ranks 125th of 204. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (-0.27 − -2.5) / (2.5 − -2.5) = 44.61The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Rule of law indexTier A
100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
Ranks 152nd of 175 · native score 12.3 · reference year 2025
13percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Rule of law index
- Scale
- 100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
- Raw value
- 0.123 index (0–1)
- Native score
- 12.3 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 13th percentile — ranks 152nd of 175. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.12 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 12.3The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
- Women in parliamentTier A
100 = all seats held by women, 0 = none (≈50 = parity)
Ranks 2nd of 193 · native score 55.74 · reference year 2025
99percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Women in parliament
- Scale
- 100 = all seats held by women, 0 = none (≈50 = parity)
- Raw value
- 55.7447 % of seats
- Native score
- 55.74 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 99th percentile — ranks 2nd of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (55.74 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 55.74The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Health
- Diabetes prevalenceTier A
100 = lowest diabetes prevalence (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 115th of 208 · native score 73.58 · reference year 2024
45percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Diabetes prevalence
- Scale
- 100 = lowest diabetes prevalence (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 9.4 % of adults 20–79
- Native score
- 73.58 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 45th percentile — ranks 115th of 208. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (9.4 − 1.5) / (31.4 − 1.5) ] = 73.58Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.5) and highest (31.4) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = highest health spending per capita, 0 = lowest
Ranks 58th of 193 · native score 63.62 · reference year 2020
70percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Health expenditure per capita
- Scale
- 100 = highest health spending per capita, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 1,199.35 current US$ per capita
- Native score
- 63.62 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 70th percentile — ranks 58th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Log + min–max (log scale, for skewed data)
score = 100 · (ln 1,199.35 − ln 17.44) / (ln 13,473.19 − ln 17.44) = 63.62Log scale (values are heavily skewed). 0 and 100 are the dataset's min (17.44) and max (13,473.19) — relative, not absolute or year-over-year comparable.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2020
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Hospital beds per 1,000Tier A
100 = most hospital beds per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
Ranks 34th of 191 · native score 19.14 · reference year 2023
82percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Hospital beds per 1,000
- Scale
- 100 = most hospital beds per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 4.33 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 19.14 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 82th percentile — ranks 34th of 191. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (4.33 − 0.15) / (21.99 − 0.15) = 19.14Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.15) and highest (21.99) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = full DTP3 coverage, 0 = none
Ranks 1st of 193 · native score 99 · reference year 2024
95percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Immunization coverage (DTP3)
- Scale
- 100 = full DTP3 coverage, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 99 % of children aged 12–23 months
- Native score
- 99 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 95th percentile — ranks 1st of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (99 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 99The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Infant mortality rateTier A
100 = lowest infant mortality in the dataset, 0 = highest
Ranks 58th of 195 · native score 92.08 · reference year 2024
71percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Infant mortality rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest infant mortality in the dataset, 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 6.8 per 1,000 live births
- Native score
- 92.08 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 71th percentile — ranks 58th of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (6.8 − 1.2) / (71.9 − 1.2) ] = 92.08Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.2) and highest (71.9) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Life expectancy at birthTier A
100 = longest life expectancy in the dataset, 0 = shortest
Ranks 65th of 215 · native score 74.16 · reference year 2024
70percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life expectancy at birth
- Scale
- 100 = longest life expectancy in the dataset, 0 = shortest
- Raw value
- 78.264 years
- Native score
- 74.16 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 70th percentile — ranks 65th of 215. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (78.26 − 54.64) / (86.5 − 54.64) = 74.16Min and max are this dataset's lowest (54.64) and highest (86.5) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Maternal mortality ratioTier A
100 = lowest maternal mortality (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 83rd of 194 · native score 56.96 · reference year 2023
57percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Maternal mortality ratio
- Scale
- 100 = lowest maternal mortality (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 35 deaths per 100,000 live births
- Native score
- 56.96 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 57th percentile — ranks 83rd of 194. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 35 among 194 countries ] = 56.96The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Physicians per 1,000Tier A
100 = most physicians per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
Ranks 1st of 195 · native score 100 · reference year 2021
100percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Physicians per 1,000
- Scale
- 100 = most physicians per capita in the dataset, 0 = fewest
- Raw value
- 9.542 per 1,000 people
- Native score
- 100 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 100th percentile — ranks 1st of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (9.54 − 0.04) / (9.54 − 0.04) = 100Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.04) and highest (9.54) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2021
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Safe sanitationTier A
100 = universal safe sanitation, 0 = none
Ranks 91st of 145 · native score 45.88 · reference year 2024
38percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Safe sanitation
- Scale
- 100 = universal safe sanitation, 0 = none
- Raw value
- 45.8769 % of population
- Native score
- 45.88 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 38th percentile — ranks 91st of 145. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (45.88 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 45.88The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Tobacco useTier A
100 = lowest tobacco use (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 69th of 166 · native score 71.55 · reference year 2024
59percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Tobacco use
- Scale
- 100 = lowest tobacco use (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 16.1 % of adults
- Native score
- 71.55 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 59th percentile — ranks 69th of 166. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (16.1 − 3.1) / (48.8 − 3.1) ] = 71.55Min and max are this dataset's lowest (3.1) and highest (48.8) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Under-5 mortality rateTier A
100 = lowest under-5 mortality (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 62nd of 195 · native score 68.21 · reference year 2024
68percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Under-5 mortality rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest under-5 mortality (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 8.6 deaths per 1,000 live births
- Native score
- 68.21 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 68th percentile — ranks 62nd of 195. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 8.6 among 195 countries ] = 68.21The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- UndernourishmentTier A
100 = lowest undernourishment (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 1st of 169 · native score 100 · reference year 2006
81percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Undernourishment
- Scale
- 100 = lowest undernourishment (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 2.5 % of population
- Native score
- 100 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 81th percentile — ranks 1st of 169. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (2.5 − 2.5) / (54.2 − 2.5) ] = 100Min and max are this dataset's lowest (2.5) and highest (54.2) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2006
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Economy
100 = highest employment ratio in the dataset, 0 = lowest
Ranks 133rd of 186 · native score 45.86 · reference year 2025
29percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Employment-to-population ratio
- Scale
- 100 = highest employment ratio in the dataset, 0 = lowest
- Raw value
- 51.335 % of population 15+
- Native score
- 45.86 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 29th percentile — ranks 133rd of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (51.34 − 21.21) / (86.9 − 21.21) = 45.86Min and max are this dataset's lowest (21.21) and highest (86.9) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
100 = most export-oriented (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 75th of 192 · native score 20.82 · reference year 2024
61percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Exports of goods & services
- Scale
- 100 = most export-oriented (% GDP), 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
- Raw value
- 42.4702 % of GDP
- Native score
- 20.82 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 61th percentile — ranks 75th of 192. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (42.47 − 1.1) / (199.76 − 1.1) = 20.82Min and max are this dataset's lowest (1.1) and highest (199.76) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2024
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Unemployment rateTier A
100 = lowest unemployment in the dataset, 0 = highest
Ranks 15th of 186 · native score 95.26 · reference year 2025
92percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Unemployment rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest unemployment in the dataset, 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 1.746 % of labour force
- Native score
- 95.26 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 92th percentile — ranks 15th of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (1.75 − 0.13) / (34.2 − 0.13) ] = 95.26Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.13) and highest (34.2) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
- Youth unemployment rateTier A
100 = lowest youth unemployment (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 23rd of 186 · native score 94.99 · reference year 2025
88percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Youth unemployment rate
- Scale
- 100 = lowest youth unemployment (best), 0 = highest
- Raw value
- 4.277 % of labour force 15–24
- Native score
- 94.99 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 88th percentile — ranks 23rd of 186. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 − [ 100 · (4.28 − 0.46) / (76.77 − 0.46) ] = 94.99Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.46) and highest (76.77) values, so the score is relative to the current country set. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
- Source
- World Bank · World Bank
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2025
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- World Development Indicators and related databases, retrieved via the World Bank API (api.worldbank.org), most recent value per country. Each metric's indicator code and primary compiler (e.g. UN, WHO, ITU, UN IGME) are given in its methodology.
Quality of life & wellbeing
- Human Development IndexTier A
100 = highest human development (HDI 1.0), 0 = lowest (HDI 0)
Ranks 97th of 193 · native score 76.2 · reference year 2023
50percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Human Development Index
- Scale
- 100 = highest human development (HDI 1.0), 0 = lowest (HDI 0)
- Raw value
- 0.762 HDI (0–1)
- Native score
- 76.2 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 50th percentile — ranks 97th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.76 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 76.2The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- UNDP — Human Development Report · United Nations Development Programme
- License
- CC BY 3.0 IGO
- Reference year
- 2023
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier A — Official / robust
- Source notes
- Human Development Index, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (ourworldindata.org/grapher/human-development-index), which republishes the UNDP HDR series. Primary source and methodology owner is UNDP.
100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
Ranks 99th of 165 · native score 54.18 · reference year 2011
40percentileHow is this calculated?
- Metric
- Life satisfaction (happiness)
- Scale
- 100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
- Raw value
- 5.418 Cantril ladder (0–10)
- Native score
- 54.18 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
- Percentile rank
- 40th percentile — ranks 99th of 165. Comparable across metrics.
- Normalization
- Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (5.42 − 0) / (10 − 0) = 54.18The index is kept on its own published scale.
- Source
- World Happiness Report (via Our World in Data) · World Happiness Report / Gallup
- License
- CC BY 4.0
- Reference year
- 2011
- Retrieved
- 2026-07-12
- Confidence
- Tier B — Reputable / modeled
- Source notes
- Self-reported life evaluation (Cantril ladder, 0–10) from the Gallup World Poll, published in the World Happiness Report, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Survey-based (Tier B).