Kosovo

UNK

Southeast Europe · Europe

The circle shows each metric's percentile rank (position among countries with data), which is comparable across metrics. Each metric's native score uses its own scale and is not comparable between metrics — see it (and the full formula) in “How is this calculated?”.

18 metrics for this country

Environment & infrastructure

CO₂ emissions per capitaTier A
100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
Ranks 143rd of 214 · native score 33.41 · reference year 2024
33percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
CO₂ emissions per capita
Scale
100 = lowest emissions per capita (best), 0 = highest
Raw value
4.77799 tonnes CO₂ per capita
Native score
33.41 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
33th percentile — ranks 143rd of 214. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 4.78 among 214 countries ] = 33.41
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Global Carbon Project (via Our World in Data) · Global Carbon Project
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2024
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
Per-capita CO₂ emissions from the Global Carbon Project's Global Carbon Budget, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.

Safety & crime

Deaths in armed conflictsTier A
100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
Ranks 1st of 197 · native score 63.71 · reference year 2025
64percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Deaths in armed conflicts
Scale
100 = fewest conflict deaths (most at peace), 0 = most
Raw value
0 deaths per year
Native score
63.71 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
64th percentile — ranks 1st of 197. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 0 among 197 countries ] = 63.71
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Uppsala Conflict Data Program (via Our World in Data) · Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP)
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
Deaths in armed conflicts, best estimate, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
Recorded assault rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED assault offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 11th of 37 · native score 71.62 · reference year 2020
72percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded assault rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED assault offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
15.37 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
71.62 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
72th percentile — ranks 11th of 37. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 15.37 among 37 countries ] = 71.62
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2020
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded corruption offence rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED corruption offence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 23rd of 36 · native score 37.5 · reference year 2016
38percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded corruption offence rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED corruption offence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
14.68 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
37.5 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
38th percentile — ranks 23rd of 36. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 14.68 among 36 countries ] = 37.5
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2016
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded drug offence rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED drug offence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 12th of 37 · native score 68.92 · reference year 2020
69percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded drug offence rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED drug offence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
68.07 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
68.92 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
69th percentile — ranks 12th of 37. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 68.07 among 37 countries ] = 68.92
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2020
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded kidnapping rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED kidnapping offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 23rd of 35 · native score 35.71 · reference year 2020
36percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded kidnapping rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED kidnapping offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
0.84 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
35.71 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
36th percentile — ranks 23rd of 35. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 0.84 among 35 countries ] = 35.71
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2020
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded robbery rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED robbery offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 7th of 38 · native score 82.89 · reference year 2020
83percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded robbery rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED robbery offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
9.37 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
82.89 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
83th percentile — ranks 7th of 38. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 9.37 among 38 countries ] = 82.89
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2020
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded sexual violence rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED sexual violence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 8th of 36 · native score 79.17 · reference year 2019
79percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded sexual violence rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED sexual violence offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
8.52 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
79.17 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
79th percentile — ranks 8th of 36. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 8.52 among 36 countries ] = 79.17
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2019
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).
Recorded theft rateTier C
100 = fewest RECORDED theft offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Ranks 8th of 38 · native score 80.26 · reference year 2020
80percentile
Low reliability (Tier C — Survey / proxy). Survey-based, patchy, or proxy metric. Indicative only — coverage gaps and methodology limits are significant. Not a definitive ranking.
How is this calculated?
Metric
Recorded theft rate
Scale
100 = fewest RECORDED theft offences among covered European countries, 0 = most (recorded ≠ actual — see caution)
Raw value
237.02 per 100,000 population (recorded)
Native score
80.26 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
80th percentile — ranks 8th of 38. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Percentile rank across countries
score = 100 − [ percentile rank of 237.02 among 38 countries ] = 80.26
The score is the country's position in the distribution. Direction is inverted (higher raw value = worse), so the position is subtracted from 100.
Source
Eurostat · Eurostat (European Commission)
License
CC BY 4.0 (Commission Decision 2011/833/EU — free reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2020
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier C — Survey / proxy
Source notes
Police-recorded offences by category (crim_off_cat), per 100,000 inhabitants. European reporting countries only. Recorded ≠ actual crime — confounded by reporting propensity, police recording practice, and legal definitions (Tier C).

Governance & institutions

Corruption Perceptions IndexTier A
100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
Ranks 73rd of 180 · native score 44 · reference year 2024
59percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Corruption Perceptions Index
Scale
100 = cleanest (least corrupt), 0 = most corrupt
Raw value
44 CPI score (0–100)
Native score
44 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
59th percentile — ranks 73rd of 180. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (44 − 0) / (100 − 0) = 44
The index is kept on its own published scale.
Source
Transparency International · Transparency International
License
CC BY-ND 4.0
Reference year
2024
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
CPI retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror (ourworldindata.org/grapher/ti-corruption-perception-index), which republishes the official TI CPI series verbatim. Snapshot verified against Transparency International's official CPI 2024 figures and matches exactly (spot-checked: DNK 90, FIN 88, SGP 84, DEU 75, USA 65, ESP 56, SSD 8). We were unable to fetch TI's primary file directly (their CDN returns an access-denied stub for the CPI xlsx and no clean CSV is offered), so the OWID mirror is the machine-readable source; primary source and methodology owner is Transparency International.
Electoral democracy indexTier A
100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
Ranks 68th of 175 · native score 63.1 · reference year 2025
61percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Electoral democracy index
Scale
100 = most democratic (index 1.0), 0 = least democratic
Raw value
0.631 index (0–1)
Native score
63.1 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
61th percentile — ranks 68th of 175. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.63 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 63.1
The index is kept on its own published scale.
Source
V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
Freedom of expression indexTier A
100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
Ranks 71st of 175 · native score 76.6 · reference year 2025
60percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Freedom of expression index
Scale
100 = most free expression (index 1.0), 0 = least
Raw value
0.766 index (0–1)
Native score
76.6 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
60th percentile — ranks 71st of 175. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.77 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 76.6
The index is kept on its own published scale.
Source
V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.
Rule of law indexTier A
100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
Ranks 75th of 175 · native score 66.2 · reference year 2025
57percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Rule of law index
Scale
100 = strongest rule of law (index 1.0), 0 = weakest
Raw value
0.662 index (0–1)
Native score
66.2 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
57th percentile — ranks 75th of 175. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (0.66 − 0) / (1 − 0) = 66.2
The index is kept on its own published scale.
Source
V-Dem Institute (via Our World in Data) · V-Dem Institute, University of Gothenburg
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) expert-coded indices (electoral democracy, rule of law, freedom of expression), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Expert-coded estimates; see V-Dem for uncertainty intervals.

Economy

GDP growth (projection)Tier B
100 = highest projected growth, 0 = lowest
Ranks 59th of 189 · native score 23.47 · reference year 2031
69percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
GDP growth (projection)
Scale
100 = highest projected growth, 0 = lowest
Raw value
3.85 % per year (avg 2026–2031)
Native score
23.47 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
69th percentile — ranks 59th of 189. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (3.85 − 0.62) / (14.38 − 0.62) = 23.47
Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0.62) and highest (14.38) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
Source
IMF (World Economic Outlook) · International Monetary Fund
License
IMF terms (reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2031
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier B — Reputable / modeled
Source notes
IMF World Economic Outlook via the IMF DataMapper API (imf.org/external/datamapper).
Government debtTier BDescriptive
100 = highest debt (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 178th of 193 · native score 5.67 · reference year 2025
8percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Government debt
Scale
100 = highest debt (% GDP) in the dataset, 0 = lowest — descriptive, not better or worse
Raw value
17.5 % of GDP
Native score
5.67 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
8th percentile — ranks 178th of 193. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (17.5 − 0) / (308.7 − 0) = 5.67
Min and max are this dataset's lowest (0) and highest (308.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
Source
IMF (World Economic Outlook) · International Monetary Fund
License
IMF terms (reuse with attribution)
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier B — Reputable / modeled
Source notes
IMF World Economic Outlook via the IMF DataMapper API (imf.org/external/datamapper).

Quality of life & wellbeing

Life satisfaction (happiness)Tier B
100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
Ranks 17th of 165 · native score 69.1 · reference year 2025
90percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Life satisfaction (happiness)
Scale
100 = highest average life evaluation (ladder 10), 0 = lowest (ladder 0)
Raw value
6.91 Cantril ladder (0–10)
Native score
69.1 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
90th percentile — ranks 17th of 165. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Native rescale (index kept on its own scale)
score = 100 · (6.91 − 0) / (10 − 0) = 69.1
The index is kept on its own published scale.
Source
World Happiness Report (via Our World in Data) · World Happiness Report / Gallup
License
CC BY 4.0
Reference year
2025
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier B — Reputable / modeled
Source notes
Self-reported life evaluation (Cantril ladder, 0–10) from the Gallup World Poll, published in the World Happiness Report, retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror. Survey-based (Tier B).

Demographics & migration

Median ageTier ADescriptive
100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 124th of 237 · native score 37.77 · reference year 2023
48percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Median age
Scale
100 = oldest median age, 0 = youngest — descriptive, not better or worse
Raw value
31.43 years
Native score
37.77 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
48th percentile — ranks 124th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (31.43 − 14.32) / (59.63 − 14.32) = 37.77
Min and max are this dataset's lowest (14.32) and highest (59.63) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
Source
UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
License
CC BY 3.0 IGO
Reference year
2023
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.
Population change (projection)Tier ADescriptive
100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
Ranks 168th of 237 · native score 23 · reference year 2050
29percentile
How is this calculated?
Metric
Population change (projection)
Scale
100 = fastest projected growth, 0 = fastest projected decline — descriptive, not better or worse
Raw value
-2.4 % change 2024→2050
Native score
23 — this metric's own 0–100 scale; not comparable to other metrics.
Percentile rank
29th percentile — ranks 168th of 237. Comparable across metrics.
Normalization
Min–max (rescaled against the dataset)
score = 100 · (-2.4 − -32.9) / (99.7 − -32.9) = 23
Min and max are this dataset's lowest (-32.9) and highest (99.7) values, so the score is relative to the current country set.
Source
UN World Population Prospects (via Our World in Data) · UN DESA, Population Division
License
CC BY 3.0 IGO
Reference year
2050
Retrieved
2026-07-12
Confidence
Tier A — Official / robust
Source notes
UN World Population Prospects (median age; medium-variant projections), retrieved via the Our World in Data mirror.